The Friendship Paradox says that your friends are likely to have more friends on average than you do. I was wondering whether there are settings in which the statement of the Friendship Paradox does not hold. Below we think about this question in precise mathematical terminology.

Friendships, social networks, and the like are often modelled using simple graphs. People are represented by vertices, and each edge denotes a pair of friends. The set of friends, or neighbors, of a vertex is defined to be . The number of friends, or the degree of is set to be and the average number of the friends of a person’s friends is defined by .

We say that a person (or vertex) is *proud* if and . One interesting version of the question above is: Do there exist graphs such that more than half of the people are proud?

The following insight is elementary, but it was still a surprise for me: It turns out that the share of proud people can be arbitrarily close to .. In order to prove this, take any integer and consider the complete graph on points with *one edge removed*. It is easy to see that the 2 people adjacent to the sole edge that was removed are the only ones that are not proud. So the share of proud people is which converges to as grows large.